Friday, 26 June 2009

You can't do that in a classroom!

I’ve often noticed a perception amongst colleagues and students that eLearning can only ever be a poor substitute for what they consider ‘real’ learning environments which are, necessarily, face-to-face. While there is considerable evidence to suggest that eLearning should avoid simply replicating face-to-face teaching and learning strategies, too often that is precisely how eLearning is judged: on its capacity (or lack thereof) to support what can be done in a face-to-face setting. What we see here is that ‘traditional’ or ‘face-to-face’ learning operates as a kind of normative discourse: a set of shared assumptions about how teaching and learning ought to happen.

Experienced users of eLearning (whether in stand-alone or hybrid/blended situations) will agree that there are many, many things you can do in an online learning environment that you simply can’t do in the rigidly synchronous environment of a face-to-face classroom. What this tells us is that rather than being an ideal against which other types of learning environments should be measured, the face-to-face learning environment, like all learning environments, has both strengths and limitations. It’s become the norm or standard against which other environments are measured simply because for so long it was the only environment available.

I think it’s time we shifted our thinking away from what eLearning can do to what traditional teaching environments can’t do. The simple fact is, however, that such thinking is deeply iconoclastic. The simple suggestion that traditional, face-to-face learning environments have limitations and *gasp* may even be found wanting is unthinkable to many teachers and learners who have never experienced anything else. But that’s precisely the point. It’s vital that we be able to evaluate different teaching and learning environments on their objective relative merits in order to best harness their distinct potentials. As such, it’s vital that we move away from old-fashioned hierarchical thinking that positions face-to-face learning environments at the top of the heap.

To that end, here is a list of 5 things that can’t be (easily) done in a rigidly synchronous learning space (a time-limited physical face-to-face classroom):

1 It is difficult or impossible for everyone to make a valuable and useful contribution – particularly in large groups.
- Face-to face classrooms offer little in the way of ‘democracy’ of learning. If you’re shy, find speaking in public hard, have a first language other than that being used for discussion, and/or live with a speaking or hearing difficulty then a face-to-face discussion can be incredibly alienating and difficult to participate in. While participation in a discussion or face-to-face activity isn’t essential for effective learning, being consistently excluded from them can be demoralising and limiting for students.

2 It’s impossible to provide learning at a time and place where all students are ready and prepared to learn it.
- We know students learn at different paces and build on different sets of prior understanding. Assuming that they’re ready to learn what they need to learn at, say, 10.30am on a particular Thursday morning is anathema to this. If a student is not ready at that designated point in time, once the class has finished, they’ve missed their chance and can only achieve the learning on their own. If, for instance, they listen to a 50 minute lecture which they simply don’t understand, even if they go away afterwards and do further reading/research to deepen their understanding, they can’t revisit the lecture as it’s been and gone. They’re also unlikely to have useful notes to which they can refer.
- students who have to miss face-to-face classes (because of illness, caring and/or work responsibilities etc) will always have a significantly impaired learning experience when face-to-face environments prevail.
- face-to-face classes make it hard to tap into the zeitgeist that can make learning authentic. In other words, when something happens in the cultural, social and/or political sphere (such as a scientific breakthrough being reported in the media or a crisis emerging on a reality television show) which is relevant to what the students are learning, they can’t discuss it with each other immediately or as it’s developing but must wait until the next scheduled class which could be up to a fortnight away.

3 It’s difficult or impossible for students to break away to reflect on their understanding or conduct more research to better inform their engagement with the subject at hand.
- In the rigidly limited time of a synchronous class there’s simply no time for students to stop and have a think about their understanding or do any further reading or research to inform their understanding. This impedes students who learn at a slower pace, or those who need more time to digest, reflect and ‘fine-tune’ their thinking and understanding before contributing. If these students achieve learning breakthroughs after the class time has expired, they’re unlikely to be able to make a contribution as there will necessarily be a significant break before the next class which will, more often than not, be moving on to a new topic and offer little opportunity for revisiting previous discussions.
- In face-to-face learning environments students are often disconnected from tools which they can use to search for resources (such as web-enabled computers and smartphones) and if they are connected, teachers often discourage students from using them in a classroom (for example by asking them to turn off their phones).

4 It’s difficult to have students practice and develop their writing skills, to write collaboratively or learn vicariously in a face-to-face classroom.
- While seminars offer a valuable peer-learning opportunity, the vast majority of collaboration in a seminar happens through oral communication even though the vast majority of their assessment is undertaken through written communication; this immediately presents a significant misalignment between teaching and assessment strategies. There simply isn’t enough time for all students to practice their writing and share it with each other in a standard face-to-face classroom or to assess all students by viva-voce.
- In face-to-face classes students almost never have an opportunity to work collaboratively with their peers in the construction of written materials. Face-to-face classes therefore offer no peer-learning opportunities that students can use to develop their written communication skills.
- It’s difficult for students in a face-to-face classroom to undertake vicarious learning – in other words to watch other students learn - by reading their scholarly writing.

5 It’s difficult or impossible to give all students regular, targeted and personalised feedback on their informal learning achievements.
- most students only get personal, targeted feedback on their formal assessment submissions which can be as few as two times per module. Offering regular, written feedback and feedforward to all students on their participation and contribution to face-to-face classes is both difficult and rare.


With thanks to Sue Folley for her advice and comments.

17 comments:

  1. Excellent blog post, really like it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Me too. Teachers really need to start thinking clearly about the tools and techniques they use these days and begin to evaluate their worth. As you suggest - they could be surprised.
    David Sugden

    ReplyDelete
  3. In the beginning I would congratulate you in composing such a great section of write-up. Exhibiting many extraordinary composing expertise which have built your site worth reading. geo marketing Specialist composition internet writers, Writing along with Modifying: The reputable wellspring involving Specialist Essay or dissertation Writers' all around home data, joins, along with societal motion.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I just have a fugitive gaze here and endure nice to undertake to travel seeking out this periodical. created content composing hand and very cooperative internet location. I foresee most of we've got got got a bent to tend to tend to tend to tend to alliance bureau unit to appear for out these types of things, here we've got got got a bent to tend to tend to tend to unit adept to recognise everything instant payday loans. I’m with the content honor and do esteem him as a directly provider. Thanks for your efforts and you too.

    ReplyDelete
  5. banyak wanita yang kurang puas terhadap pasangannya yang diakibatkan penis kurang besar dan panjang, oleh sebab itu kami menawarkan obat pembesar alat vital yang dapat memperbaiki ukuran penis anda dan bisa merubah gaya hidup anda yang lebih harmonis.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Articles don't have to be long. Infact most people get depleted and possessed in case it is to long. So hold fast to the truths of each given subject, a page of noteworthy information is sufficient. custom paper writing service

    ReplyDelete
  7. Online loan moneylenders don't have the tolerance of Visa organizations. These advances are more hazardous as those with credit difficulties could in any case meet all requirements for a brisk money advance. Payday Loans

    ReplyDelete
  8. I picked up the fax numbers to my payday credit affiliations and sent them see on who to contact as for the reimbursement of my advances. In the event that you do this make a point to join your record number and regulated attempt trusts number so they can fittingly find your record. Cash Advance San-diego

    ReplyDelete
  9. There is deserted ill will in the yearly business area, and moneylenders are forceful for candidate thought. The included request you ask, the greater would be your game plan. Payday Loans

    ReplyDelete
  10. In any case, force up and admeasurement substituting choices that are achievable to you. Bike Loans are one such extension that has the limit accord you banknote in the way that you like. Check Cashing San-diego

    ReplyDelete
  11. Notwithstanding the way that the title bank won't approach you what the money is for, oversee yourself to not taking out a vehicle title progress pointlessly. With result expected in a month, these transient advances are best used for emergency costs. Take out accurately what you genuinely oblige so the part is to a lesser degree a weight toward the month's end term period. Cash Advance

    ReplyDelete
  12. In opposition to what numerous individuals may think, the idea of the electric auto is not a late, present day thought but rather has been around since the early years of the car business itself. Amid those days, early outlines of cars were either taking into account gas, electric and steam motors. car title loans near me chicago

    ReplyDelete
  13. Notwithstanding, be appropriate with the avaricious handle, your astounding position accumulation is not by any appointment the abandoned accumulation envolved in your application. Case expenses, charges,search costs, clarification, aperture starting alpha backward and warrantees affidavit additionally be tended to. afresh again, thats addendum banal all together. www.aaa1autotitleloans.com/chicago

    ReplyDelete
  14. Sehubungan dengan apa yang saya baca di isi judul posting ini setidaknya dapat memberikan atau menambah wawasan yang sangat berguna bagi saya...terima kasih banyak
    vimax pro extender alat pembesar penis
    pembesar alat vital
    sepasang pasutri ketagihan
    istri jadi bringas
    sex terlaris 2015
    persepsi orang tentang vimax

    ReplyDelete